Will it be a slam dunk for the US sports betting restriction?
By Natalie Sherman
bet9ja.com
Business press reporter, New york city
A restriction on sports betting wagering in most US states might be reversed by a case being considered by the Supreme Court.
The state of New Jersey is challenging the 1992 federal law that mostly forbade sports betting gambling, explaining the matter as a "states' rights" concern.
The case, which started on Monday, comes after New Jersey homeowners voted in 2011 to legalise sports betting.
A group of sports betting leagues opposes banking on games, which they fear will motivate match-fixing.
Lower courts have actually consistently ruled versus New Jersey, saying it is within the federal government's power to limit a state's policy options.
The Supreme Court chose to hear the case however in the middle of a wider shift in American mindsets toward gambling.
Before 1976, Nevada - home of the Las Vegas strip - was the only state with legal gambling establishments outside Native American lands.
bet9ja.com
But in current years, states starving for tax earnings in the wake of the financial crash have enacted a rash of looser sports betting laws, collecting substantial levies on gambling income.
There are now 24 states with business roughly double the number a decade earlier.
Despite the main restriction, which already excuses Nevada and 3 other states, prohibited sports betting wagering is swarming in the US.
Americans place about $154bn in illegal sports betting bets every year, according to the American Gaming Association.
The association's president, Geoff Freeman, described the federal restriction, external as an "utter failure" previously this year.
It states the UK is an example of a country where sports betting is prevalent.
"It's time for Washington to stop depriving states of critical tax profits and permit them to reap the rewards of a regulated market," Mr Freeman stated.
More than 15 states submitted documents in support of New Jersey in the case. A handful have actually already passed laws to authorise sports betting in the event of a change.
'Times have altered'
On Monday, as attorneys started arguments for the Supreme Court, some more conservative judges appeared sceptical of the existing law.
The court is expected to decide in June 2018.
"If we are successful here we might have bets being taken in New Jersey within two weeks of a choice by the court," said outgoing New Jersey guv Chris Christie after attending the court hearing. "We're prepared in New Jersey - we're prepared to go."
Despite the court's last judgment, Congress might also take up the dispute amid broader discussion about online video gaming and e-sports betting.
Even a few of the expert sports betting leagues have actually begun to change their positions on the concern of gaming.
Adam Silver, National Basketball Association commissioner, supported a federal law that would create a consistent set of guidelines throughout the US. "Times have altered," he wrote in a 2014 viewpoint piece, external.
Addicts dealing with mobile sports betting
3 October 2017
The challenging issue of problem gambling
31 August 2017
bit.ly
1
Will it be a Slam Dunk for the United States Sports Betting Ban?
williamizzo398 edited this page 2025-01-02 09:47:44 +08:00